Clinical Updates
Alzheimer's
Disease
Arthritis
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Chronic
Lymphocytic Leukemia
Depression
Diabetes Mellitus
Dyspepsia
Erectile
Dysfunction
Fatty Liver
Gallstone
Hepatitis
Hypertension
Lung Cancer
Mesothelioma
Metabolic Syndrome
Obesity
Prostate Cancer
Stroke
Tinnitus
Medical Library
Breaking Medical News
Clinical Tools
Dermatology
Diabetes Corner Evidence-Based Medicine
Free Medical Books
Free
Medical Journal History Taking and Physical Examination
Hows on Making Diagnostic Examination
Medical Journal (popular)
Medical Organizations
Palm Tools
Medical Notes

Medical Physiology (Lecture)
Medical Resources
Medical Search
Online Clinical Calculator
Online Sari-
Sari Store
Please
support Clinica Cayanga Medical Resources by purchasing gift items
at


|
| The Syndrome of Heart
Failure |
Definitions
Epidemiology
Aetiologies
Pathophysiology
Clinical assessment
Treatment
Prognosis |
Definitions
‘Heart failure' is an unfortunate term. It has negative
connotations for the patient and describes imprecisely
several different clinical situations. Left and right
heart failure are quite distinct clinical syndromes,
although they frequently coexist. Subdivisions into
forward, backward, and high output failure have not
proved to be particularly useful. A more useful
classification is dependent on the predominant pattern
of left ventricular dysfunction, be it systolic,
diastolic, or mixed. Whatever the complexities of the
ventricular pathophysiology, a well-recognized clinical
pattern is identifiable as ‘heart failure', one which
has proved a useful description of a complex syndrome
for many years.
The pertinent features of any definition of heart
failure are that the clinical picture is:
(1) initiated by a reduction in effective cardiovascular
(usually left ventricular) functional reserve
(2) associated with symptoms either at rest or at an
unexpectedly low level of exertion
(3) associated with characteristic pathophysiological
changes in many disparate organ systems.
In simple terms heart failure is a syndrome in which a
reduction in left ventricular function causes
pathophysiology which produces symptoms and exercise
limitation.
A clinical picture similar to that of heart failure can
develop when ventricular function is normal. These
include volume overload conditions such as endotoxic
high-output shock, severe anaemia, arteriovenous
fistulae or shunts, and pressure overload conditions
such as acute hypertensive crisis or prosthetic heart
valve occlusion. Acute, chronic, or acute on chronic are
also useful subdivisions. The acute syndrome usually
presents dramatically with dyspnoea, tachycardia,
pulmonary or peripheral oedema and underperfusion of
systemic organs. Exercise intolerance is the prominent
feature of chronic failure, and when it is severe there
may also be chronic pulmonary and peripheral oedema with
breathlessness at rest. Acute exacerbations are then
common.
|
Epidemiology
Heart failure is common with an estimated incidence of
20–30 per 1000 per year and a prevalence overall of
about 1 per cent. The prevalence increases with age,
reaching 30 per cent in the over-80 year olds.
Paradoxically, improvements in the management of acute
myocardial infarction and chronic heart disease has led
to more heart failure, as more people survive to develop
it later in life. |
Aetiologies
In Western societies the most common causes are
ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, and idiopathic
dilated cardiomyopathy. Some hypertensives may develop a
dilated poorly functioning heart with an eventual
normalization in arterial pressure; such cases may be
diagnosed as idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Previously common causes such as nutritional disorders
or complications of rheumatic valvular disease are now
rare. In less developed societies, infective causes
still underlie the majority of cases. Particular
disorders may be common in individual societies. These
include Chagas' disease in Central and Southern America,
iron overload in certain tribes in southern Africa, and
nutritional deficiency states in the world's poorest
countries. More than one cause of heart failure can
coexist, such as hypertension and ischaemic heart
disease.
|
Pathophysiology
Cardiac structural changes
Structural changes in the heart are common. There is
usually enlargement of the left ventricular cavity
(except in diastolic dysfunction and restrictive or
constrictive cardiomyopathies). The shape of the
ventricle also becomes more spherical. This can occur
quickly after a myocardial infarction via stretching of
the infarcted territory or more slowly in a process
termed ‘remodelling'. A similar change in shape is seen
in dilated cardiomyopathies but not in the restrictive
cardiomyopathies. The more spherical shape of the
‘remodelled' and enlarged ventricle increases the stress
of the myocardial wall and may thereby worsen myocardial
ischaemia. Change in shape may also disrupt the
conformational changes which normally occur during the
isovolumic contraction phase in which the apex of the
ventricle constricts in a twisting motion and pushes the
blood into the base of the ventricle. When the ventricle
is spherical at rest this intraventricular
redistribution of blood is not possible and the net
effect is a reduction in the efficiency with which the
blood is ejected. Cardiac enlargement has long been
known to be an adverse prognostic sign.
At the microscopic level there is an increase in the
collagen content of the extracellular matrix, in part
related to increased wall stress and in part to
neurohormonal activation. This change reduces
ventricular wall distensibility and may affect the
efficiency with which active restorative forces can
assist the diastolic filling process. It may also help
explain the frequent coexistence of systolic and
diastolic functional deterioration in an enlarging
ventricle in chronic heart failure.
Enlargement of the ventricle is associated with a
thinning of the ventricular wall with resultant
realignment of the intercellular attachments between
individual myocytes (‘cell slippage'). There are also a
reduced number of tight junctions between myocytes in
the failing ventricle.
Functional abnormalities
Overall circulatory function
Cardiac power output is defined as cardiac output times
the pressure drop across the systemic circulation. It is
well-preserved at rest, even in severe heart failure,
but its maximal reserve is reduced progressively as
failure progresses. However, the measurement of cardiac
power output tells us little of the underlying
mechanisms. Attempts have been made, therefore, to
define the components of ventricular function to assist
in monitoring the patient's clinical course and the
response to treatments.
Systolic dysfunction
Systolic dysfunction is most easily recognized by direct
haemodynamic measurements showing a reduced peak rate of
pressure rise within the ventricle (positive dP/dt
maximum), an increased filling pressure (left
ventricular end-diastolic pressure) or by indirect
measurement of ventricular volumes. If there is a
reduction in myocardial contractile function, an
enlargement of the ventricle and a greater preload will
enhance ventricular emptying via the Frank–Starling
mechanism. The ventricle will operate at an increased
end-diastolic and end-systolic volume. This can be
measured by pressure and volume estimations by
ventriculography (either radiographic or radionuclear)
or echocardiography. The ejection fraction carries
information about ventricular volumes and global
ventricular function and is an important predictor of
longevity, but it is a poor predictor of the severity of
symptoms.
Diastolic dysfunction
Diastole is a complex process affected by many factors
including heart rate, atrioventricular delay, atrial
contractility, active myocardial recoil, passive
ventricular wall stiffness, and the efficacy of
ventricular systole and the residual end-diastolic
volume and pressure within the ventricle. It is
therefore not surprising that no simple measure of
‘diastolic function' has been developed, and those
measures that have been used are affected profoundly by
systolic function and heart rate. Diastolic functional
disturbance is, however, important, as there are cases
of heart failure with a small heart and normal or even
increased left ventricular ejection fraction.
Abnormalities of diastolic filling may include increased
filling pressures, delayed pressure fall within the
ventricle and a greater than normal dependence on the
effects of atrial contraction for ventricular filling.
Such cases form the minority of cases of heart failure
but are seen increasingly in older patients in whom
senile myocardial fibrosis occurs more frequently.
Other, rarer, causes include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,
infiltrative conditions such as amyloid heart disease,
and the acute effects of ischaemia or the chronic
effects of advanced hypertrophy in response to
hypertension. Differentiation from systolic dysfunction
is important because of differing effects of treatment;
for instance, vasodilators may be less useful in
diastolic dysfunction because of the requirement for
high ventricular filling pressures in this condition.
Diastolic dysfunction can be quantified by a variety of
measurements. The most commonly employed are the rate
constant of isovolumic relaxation of the ventricle
during early diastole (tau), the early to late peak
filling velocity ratio (E/A) across the mitral valve on
Doppler echocardiography, and the peak rate of
ventricular filling on radionuclear gated acquisition (MUGA)
scans in end-diastolic volumes per second. None of these
is independent of the loading conditions of the
ventricle, nor of atrioventricular delay and heart rate,
nor of the effect of systolic dysfunction.
Non-cardiac features
Peripheral vascular changes
There is a reduction in large arterial compliance
leading to an increase in impedance to ventricular
outflow. Thus impaired ventricular reserve is further
stressed and there is an increase in myocardial wall
stress. The causes probably relate to sympathetic and
possibly local renin–angiotensin activation.
There have been few reports of structural changes in the
microvasculature but the endothelial-dependent vasomotor
control systems are disordered; the vasodilator system
is impaired both in the myocardial vessels and in the
periphery. Tumour necrosis factor is elevated in some
cases of chronic heart failure, and there have been
reports of enhanced activity of the endothelin
vasoconstrictor system.
Respiratory
The lungs
An acute reduction in left ventricular performance
causes a rapid increase in left ventricular filling
pressures and hence pulmonary venous pressures leading
to fluid accumulation in the lungs. This decreases the
compliance of the lung, thereby reducing vital capacity
and increasing the work of breathing. It may also, via
oedematous swelling of the bronchial mucosa, cause a
non-asthmatic bronchial constriction which can mimic
asthma and further increase respiratory muscle work.
With more severe pulmonary venous hypertension the
alveolar membrane becomes thickened and oedematous and
this may impair gas exchange leading to an increase in
the alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient and eventually
arterial hypoxaemia. Frank pulmonary oedema leads to the
clinical picture of gross dyspnoea, hypoxaemia, lung
crepitations, and the production of copious quantities
of pink frothy sputum.
In chronic heart failure, the patent remains dyspnoeic
but the changes in the lungs are far less marked.
Pulmonary venous pressures may even be normal if
diuretic treatment is effective. Subtle changes in lung
function include a reduction in gas diffusing capacity,
intermittent non-asthmatic bronchial constriction and a
purported increase in dead space ventilation.
Alterations in the volume, strength, and fatiguability
of the respiratory musculature have also been described,
similar to those seen in limb musculature.
Respiratory control
Patients with heart failure, even in the absence of
pulmonary oedema, have an increased ventilatory response
to exercise, while maintaining normal arterial blood gas
tensions. They show a reduced maximal oxygen
consumption, an early dependence on anaerobic metabolism
and an increased ventilatory equivalent for carbon
dioxide even at low work levels. Why this occurs is not
certain. There may be a primary increase in dead-space
ventilation due to a reduction in the ability of the
right ventricle to perfuse adequately all lung regions,
or the development of ventilation/perfusion mismatching.
An alternative is that something other than the rate of
carbon dioxide production causes the increased
exertional ventilation. There are several candidate
stimuli such as lactate, arterial potassium, or
adenosine. There is also a neural pathway in the control
of ventilation utilizing group III and IV afferents from
skeletal muscle. These are sensitive to the metabolic
state of exercising muscle and transmit signals to
mediate reflex increases in ventilation as well as
peripheral vasoconstriction and sympatho-excitation.
Mild alterations in gas exchange could reduce the rate
of delivery of oxygen to the metabolizing tissues and
act as a stimulus to increased ventilation. This could
explain the beneficial effects of oxygen supplementation
on exercise tolerance. In addition sensitivity of the
arterial and central chemoreceptors has recently been
shown to be elevated. It is not certain, however, that a
reduction in diffusing capacity is quantitatively
important nor that oxygen supplementation works via
increasing net oxygen delivery to the tissues. The
effect of high inspired oxygen is non-specific in
reducing peripheral chemoreflex drive and thereby
relieving the sensation of dyspnoea.
The sleep-apnoea syndrome
Episodes of apnoea may cause nocturnal oxygen saturation
to fall episodically to below 80–85 per cent. The
pattern is reminiscent of Cheyne–Stokes respiration well
recognized in severe heart failure. The mechanisms of
both abnormalities are incompletely understood. In some
cases of sleep apnoea there is an obstructive element
with obesity and pharyngeal occlusion. In others there
appears to be an alteration in the central sensitivity
to carbon dioxide so that oscillating levels of
respiratory drive and hence arterial oxygen saturations
develop. Sleep apnoea, as well as Cheyne–Stokes
breathing and alterations in low frequency heart rate
variability, may all reflect harmonic oscillations of
chemoreflex/baroreflex interaction.
Musculoskeletal
Structure
Fibre atrophy, changes in the distribution frequency of
type IIa and IIb fibres, reduced mitochondrial density,
volume, and number of cristae have all been described in
skeletal muscle in moderate or severe heart failure.
There is also a substantial reduction in muscle bulk,
sometimes amounting to cachexia, but it is not possible
to be sure of a specific skeletal myopathy of heart
failure. Even so, these changes probably reflect a
deficiency of oxygen delivery rather than the effects of
primary reduction in the amount of exercise performed.
Function
In chronic heart failure there is a reduction in the
strength of both small and large muscle groups, probably
because of inherent defects in the quality of the muscle
itself. There is also early fatiguability resulting in
reduced physical activity, which leads to further muscle
wasting and dysfunction.
Metabolism
Abnormalities of skeletal muscle metabolism in heart
failure include early depletion of phosphocreatine,
early acidification, accumulations of inorganic
phosphate, reductions in the rate of resynthesis of
phosphocreatine and of rate of removal of adenosine
diphosphate. These changes are not the result of
impaired blood flow, but probably reflect changes in
oxidative enzymes in skeletal muscle.
Autonomic and neuroendocrine systems
Activation of the neuroendocrine system helps to support
the circulation but in the long term is harmful. Adverse
consequences include hypoperfusion of organs, myocardial
toxicity, increased susceptibility to ventricular
arrhythmias and progression of the underlying disease,
be it ischaemia or cardiomyopathy.
The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system
In untreated heart failure there is a mild activation of
the systemic renin system, augmented by the use of
diuretics. In addition, there is probably activation of
the local systems in heart, kidney, brain, and blood
vessel walls. The beneficial effects of inhibition show
how important these systems may be. In the kidney,
increased local angiotensin II may contribute to
reductions in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration
rate (GFR), especially on exercise. In very severe
failure, angiotensin-mediated efferent arteriolar
constriction maintains transcapillary hydraulic pressure
(and therefore filtration) when overall perfusion
pressure is unduly low.
The autonomic nervous system
There is activation of the sympathetic nervous system
early in heart failure and a concomitant reduction in
resting vagal tone. There is no clearly understood
mechanism for this, particularly in mild cases.
Investigation of sympathovagal balance is limited by the
lack of precise and quantifiable methods, but analysis
of variations of heart rate variability shows promise in
this context. The pattern in heart failure is very
abnormal with a dramatic reduction in total heart rate
variability and a selective loss of the higher frequency
rhythm characteristic of respiratory sinus arrhythmia,
and a relative preservation of low and very low
frequency rhythms. This pattern is associated with high
risk for the development of unstable ventricular
arrhythmias and cardiac sudden death. Plasma
noradrenaline levels correlate both with the degree of
left ventricular failure, and with prognosis.
b-Receptor function
Chronic sympathetic activation leads to a depletion in
myocardial catecholamine stores and a downregulation of
b-1 receptors on the myocardium. There is also a
decoupling of receptors from the post-receptor response,
all of which lead to a loss of myocardial response to
increased sympathetic drive. Clinically this manifests
as chronotropic incompetence, loss of response to
sympathomimetic stimulation and impaired exercise
tolerance.
The natriuretic peptide systems
These peptides are natriuretic and also relax peripheral
vasculature. Their release is increased in chronic heart
failure associated with cardiac enlargement, but the
significance of the increased plasma levels is
uncertain; their natriuretic effects appear blunted in
heart failure. There is increasing interest in the
ability of elevated natriuretic peptide levels to become
a biochemical marker of left ventricular systolic
dysfunction.
The vasopressin system
Vasopressin concentrations are increased in chronic
heart failure to levels that induce marked effects. Its
actions are a combination of arteriolar vasoconstriction
as well as renal water retention.
The kidney—oedema in heart failure
Oedema in heart failure is the consequence of retention
of salt and water by the kidneys which behave in a way
that resembles their response to haemorrhage. Yet blood
volume is expanded rather than reduced leading to the
concept of reduced ‘effective' blood volume. Where this
‘ineffectiveness' might be sensed is not certain, but
candidates are arterial baroceptors and the low pressure
receptors in atrial, ventricular, and juxtapulmonary
capillaries. Those on the arterial side are more likely
to be responsible, sensing in some way inadequate
filling of the arterial tree by the sick heart. This
concept of reduced ‘effective' blood volume is also
invoked to explain renal salt and water retention when
cardiac output is much increased—as in hyperthyroidism,
arteriovenous fistula, anaemia, or beriberi—so-called
‘high output cardiac failure'.
Increased sympathetic tone, activation systemically and
locally of the renin-angiotensin system could all
plausibly be involved to explain the renal inability to
excrete sodium and water normally, but, sodium retention
in particular is likely to result from the summation of
many influences on the kidney.
How does the kidney retain sodium in heart failure?
In moderate or severe heart failure, there is striking
reduction in renal blood flow with relative preservation
of GFR particularly during exercise. These haemodynamic
changes, probably mediated by increased efferent
arteriolar tone favour sodium reabsorption by increasing
oncotic and reducing hydrostatic pressures in the
peritubular capillaries. The effects of ‘loop' diuretics
suggest that there must also be increased sodium
reabsorption in the loop of Henle and/or distal nephron
mediated by factors which are unknown. Animal studies
support an intrarenal redistribution of blood flow with
juxtamedullary sodium-retaining nephrons better perfused
than cortical nephrons, but there remains considerable
doubt as to whether this occurs in humans.
Venous pressure and oedema
Cardiac oedema was once attributed to a primary rise in
central venous pressure leading to a parallel increase
in tissue capillary pressure and via Starling forces to
increased filtration and decreased reabsorption of
fluid, resulting in oedema and a reduction in plasma
volume. This concept is untenable. In many patients
sodium retention clearly precedes any rise in central
venous pressure. At no stage in the development of
clinical or experimental heart failure has blood volume
been shown to be reduced. A reduction in lymphatic fluid
return because of an increased central venous pressure
is certainly a possible factor, but oedema must
ultimately result from primary renal retention of salt
and water.
Renal dysfunction
Low arterial pressure and the effects of the circulating
and intrarenal neurohormonal systems described above
contribute to impair renal excretory function in heart
failure. Mild increases in blood urea, with lesser ones
of plasma creatinine are common and overenthusiastic
diuretic therapy can provoke significant renal failure.
In very severe heart failure, when glomerular filtration
is dependent on angiotensin-mediated efferent arteriolar
tone, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors can
induce significant oliguria or even anuria, readily
reversed when the drug is withdrawn.
Electrolyte disturbances
These occur largely as a result of diuretic therapy,
favouring hyponatraemia, hypokalaemia, alkalosis, and
magnesium depletion.
Other organ systems
The liver
Hepatic congestion is due to venous engorgement of the
liver and can result in an increase in size, local
tenderness, and minor derangements in liver function. In
severe cases nausea and right hypochondrial discomfort
develop, and rarely jaundice. Impaired albumin and
clotting factor production (important for those taking
warfarin), and malabsorption may result.
Gastrointestinal tract
Intestinal mucosal oedema can contribute to
malabsorption and a higher rate of intestinal
angiodysplasia can lead to recurrent blood loss, another
problem for patients who require anticoagulation.
|
Clinical
assessment
History and clinical examination are aided by chest
radiography, echocardiography and, in selected cases, by
cardiac catheterization, radionuclide techniques and
imaging modalities. Exercise testing with respiratory
gas analysis can help establish the cause of symptoms in
patients with coexisting heart and lung disease.
|
|
Treatment
Salt and water retention—diuretics
Conservative measures
The value of bed rest and moderate sodium restriction
has been known for years, but these simple approaches
have been neglected since the advent of potent
diuretics. Supine bed rest enhances venous return,
increases cardiac output and the secretion of atrial
natriuretic peptide and increases the proportion of the
output reaching the kidneys, thus facilitating
natriuresis and diuresis and enhancing the efficacy of
diuretic therapy. In the stabilized patient, however,
there is evidence of the benefit of regular physical
exercise improving symptoms and exercise tolerance.
Strict sodium restriction to an intake of 20–30 mmol/day
is an unpleasant treatment, found impractical or
unacceptable by most patients, but more modest
restriction may reduce the need for drugs and thus
reduce risks of toxicity.
Fluid restriction (intake confined to 500–1000 ml/24 h)
was once commonly prescribed for heart failure and there
are still good reasons for this approach in advanced
failure, as a number of factors combine to reduce the
ability of the kidneys to excrete free water.
Diuretics
By increasing urinary excretion of salt and water,
diuretics reduce cardiac preload and thereby relieve
congestion. Most, with the exception of spironolactone,
influence renal tubular reabsorptive mechanisms in
relation to their concentration in the tubular fluid
which they reach largely by the organic ion transport
mechanisms in the proximal convoluted tubule. Because of
strong protein binding, loop agents and thiazides do not
enter tubular fluid by glomerular filtration in
significant amounts. The efficacy of a diuretic in
individual cases depends therefore not only on inherent
potency and site of action, but also critically on renal
perfusion and tubular function as well as the
antinatriuretic neurohumoral factors associated with
heart failure. In the presence of heavy proteinuria,
protein binding of diuretics in tubular fluid may also
limit their efficacy.
Thiazide diuretics
The hazards of extreme hypovolaemia, and of serious
electrolyte disturbance are less with thiazides. In
maximal doses, these agents are capable of inhibiting
reabsorption of some 5 per cent of the filtered load of
sodium, quite enough for many patients with cardiac
oedema. The dose–response curve of thiazides is flat,
with little difference between small and large doses.
Most thiazides affect urinary salt excretion for some
8–10 h but some, like chlorthalidone, last for as long
as 24–36 h.
Potassium supplements
All thiazides tend to increase urinary potassium losses
to a degree dependent on tubular flow rate, the delivery
of sodium to the distal nephron, and the extent of
secondary aldosteronism present. Chloruresis and
potassium loss both tend to produce alkalosis, which
further inhibits renal potassium conservation. The rate
at which potassium may be lost is, therefore, variable
and the need to provide supplements or not, equally
variable. There is no doubt that severe potassium
depletion can be provoked by thiazide treatment,
especially by chlorthalidone, and that such depletion
can potentiate cardiotoxic effects of digitalis
analogues. When in doubt the wisest course is to
prescribe supplements, or to combine treatment with one
of the distally acting agents which promote potassium
retention. Preparations providing thiazide diuretics and
potassium in the same tablet are often prescribed, but
the amounts of potassium incorporated may not suffice to
prevent hypokalaemia; separate preparations of the
diuretic and of potassium supplements are preferable.
Potassium-sparing diuretics
Spironolactone, amiloride, and triamterene all act on
the distal nephron, promoting modest increases in sodium
excretion and significant inhibition of potassium
secretion. Spironolactone is a true antagonist of
aldosterone. Effective doses range from 25 to 400 mg
daily and depend on the degree of aldosteronism present.
Side-effects of nausea and abdominal discomfort
complicate higher dosage and prolonged use is commonly
complicated by the development of gynaecomastia. The
onset of action is delayed for a full 24–72 h. There is
recent evidence of particular benefit from low dose
(25–50 mg) spironolactone in severe (grade IV) heart
failure.
Triamterene and amiloride block luminal sodium channels
directly. Triamterene is rather less potent and less
well tolerated than amiloride, which is as effective in
conserving potassium and excreting sodium as is
spironolactone, but free of the side-effect of
gynaecomastia. Effective doses range between 5 and 20 mg
daily.
The addition of any of these agents to thiazides or
‘loop' diuretics augments sodium excretion and reduces
potassium loss, but to a variable degree depending on
haemodynamic factors and the activity of the renin–aldosterone
system. It is not safe to assume potassium homeostasis
without regular checks of plasma levels, particularly in
the first 1–2 weeks after their introduction.
Loop' diuretics
Loop agents all act principally by inhibiting sodium
chloride cotransport in the ascending limb of the loop
of Henle, which is critical to the mechanisms of urinary
concentration and dilution. They are all extremely
potent, and promote a considerably greater excretion of
chloride than of sodium. They tend to increase urinary
potassium losses in an amount dependent on the extent of
secondary hyperaldosteronism present and the degree of
alkalosis induced by chloride deficiency or any
pre-existing potassium depletion.
These drugs are potentially dangerous particularly in
the elderly. Their remarkable potency results in a risk
of extreme hypovolaemia, postural hypotension,
circulatory failure, and uraemia when they are given
without proper supervision, particularly to patients
whose disease could well be controlled by less drastic
agents. Weight loss from diuretic therapy should be
achieved ideally at a rate not exceeding 1–2 kg/day.
These caveats apart, ‘loop' diuretics properly
prescribed provide a major advance in the care of
patients whose oedema cannot be controlled by less
powerful drugs. Given by mouth, all begin to induce
natriuresis and diuresis within 1–2 h and have a peak
effect at about 4 h, which is complete at about 6 h. The
relatively short period of action can be used to tailor
treatment for individual patients. The threshold dose
required to produce a natriuresis in any given case may
be increased for a number of reasons, including slow
gastrointestinal absorption, reduced renal perfusion,
impaired secretory function of the proximal tubule, as
well as the sodium-retaining consequences of increased
activity of the renin–angiotensin system and other
neurohumoral mechanisms. In this situation, larger
individual doses are required as a first step, with
increased frequency of administration as the second.
Resistant oedema
Combinations of loop agents, thiazides, and distal
acting drugs may fail to control fluid retention,
particularly when cardiac failure coexists with impaired
renal function. In such cases, metolazone has been shown
to be remarkably effective when combined with a loop
agent. Indeed its addition may produce an excessive
natriuresis and it is often wise to begin with a small
dose, e.g. 2.5–5 mg on alternate days, increasing if
necessary to a maximum dose of 20 mg/day.
In extreme cases ACE inhibitors may cause an acute fall
in GFR, oliguria, and uraemia secondary to inhibition of
angiotensin-mediated efferent arteriolar tone.
When fluid retention persists despite therapy, there is
a need to decide whether to increase the dose of ACE
inhibitor or of a diuretic first. Cold extremities and a
rise in blood urea above 20 mmol/litre (BUN over 60
mg/100 ml) indicates predominance of poor cardiac
output, best treated by an increase in ACE inhibition,
together with a reduction in diuretic dose. When blood
urea concentrations are below some 12–18 mmol/l (BUN
36–54 mg/100 ml) and the extremities are warm, it may be
more effective to increase the dose of diuretic first.
In cases with delayed, or inadequate absorption of loop
agents due to intestinal oedema, higher blood levels can
be achieved by the use of bolus doses given
intramuscularly or intravenously. More effective and
more comfortable for the patient is a slow infusion
given by a low pump delivering the total 24-h dose in
100 ml or less of 5 per cent dextrose.
Contraindications and complications during diuretic
therapy
There are some cardiac conditions in which removal of
fluid from the circulation is quite inappropriate,
despite clear evidence of an elevation in central venous
pressure. These include constrictive pericarditis,
pericardial tamponade, right ventricular infarction,
pulmonary embolism, or mitral valve disease when cardiac
output is severely compromised.
Prolonged treatment with loop agents or thiazides induce
hyperuricaemia and may cause gout. Hyperglycaemia can be
provoked by thiazides particularly, and the risk appears
greatest in the elderly. Hypercalcaemia is increasingly
recognized as a consequence of thiazide treatment.
Hyponatraemia represents more of a problem and,
hypomagnesaemia is often not sufficiently recognized.
Diuretic-induced hyponatraemia
This complication is never, or almost never, due to
sodium depletion, but almost always due to a relative
water overload. A number of factors contribute.
Increased tubular reabsorption of sodium in the proximal
tubule results in less sodium and chloride delivered to
the diluting sites. Excretion free water is thereby
decreased. It is decreased further by the use of
diuretics which inhibit electrolyte transport at these
diluting sites. In addition, patients with cardiac
insufficiency are often thirsty. Finally, plasma levels
of antidiuretic hormone are increased in severe heart
failure. Mild hyponatraemia needs no treatment, although
it is a sign of a guarded prognosis. More severe
hyponatraemia accompanied by symptoms requires
treatment. If diuretics cannot be reduced, the addition
of an ACE inhibitor may increase cardiac performance and
renal perfusion, but on occasion hyponatraemia follows
ACE inhibition. Water restriction is then only
moderately effective and is rarely tolerated by
patients. Demethylchlortetracycline has been tried in
this situation but usually without great benefit.
Magnesium depletion
Both ‘loop' diuretics and thiazides can provoke
magnesium depletion. Symptoms and signs are rare but can
include depression, muscle weakness, refractory
hypokalaemia, hypertension, and ventricular or atrial
dysrhythmias resistant to treatment. Treatment with
magnesium glycerophosphate is quite well accepted in
doses of 3–6 g daily providing 12–24 mmol of magnesium
per 24 h. Other possible preparations include magnesium
hydroxide which gives approximately 20 mmol in 15 ml but
at the risk of diarrhoea and less efficient absorption.
Acute pulmonary oedema
Apart from morphine, the most effective treatment is
intravenous injections of ‘loop' diuretics. Frusemide
20–40 mg increases urinary salt and water excretion
within 2 min, reaching a peak at 5–10 min and complete
within 25 or 35 min. There is some evidence that the
beneficial effects can be attributed not only to
natriuresis and diuresis but also to falls in left
atrial pressure the result of dilatation of venous
capacitance vessels.
Digitalis—maintenance therapy: indications and
regimens
Maintenance therapy may be indicated for the management
of heart failure due to systolic ventricular
dysfunction. Much debate has centred around the value of
digitalis long-term use in patients in sinus rhythm. The
situation has been clarified by 14 studies using digoxin.
Significant benefits included one or more of the
following: subjective measures, heart failure scores,
haemodynamic measures, exercise capacity, and frequency
of hospital admission. One of the trials showed that the
benefits of digoxin were additive to those of ACE
inhibitors. A subsequent randomized study showed that
withdrawal of it in patients treated with diuretics and
ACE inhibitors led to worsening heart failure. Against
the evidence of benefit must be set the possibility of
harm. Some consider that cardiac glycosides should be
used with particular caution in patients with severe
coronary heart disease because the threshold to
ventricular fibrillation may be lowered. Evidence is
inconclusive that digitalis is an independent risk
factor for death, but it cannot be pronounced innocent
in this regard. The case at present is ‘not proven'. The
DIG study, involving over 7500 patients found no
significant effect of digoxin on mortality, although
there was a reduction in the rate of admission to
hospital.
Assessment of ventricular rate during exercise should be
made before deciding the dose to control atrial
fibrillation, but in the presence of good renal function
up to 250 µg digoxin twice daily may be required. Higher
doses are very rarely needed. More commonly, smaller
doses are dictated by impaired renal function or by
unwanted effects. For most patients with sinus rhythm
and good renal function, a dose of digoxin of 250 µg
daily is usually appropriate but, with impaired renal
function, smaller doses are necessary. Digitoxin may be
better in this situation because accumulation is less
likely. The usual dose is 100 µg daily or rarely 200 µg
daily. Lower doses should be given in the presence of
impaired liver function.
Measurement of plasma concentrations
Blood samples should be drawn when plasma concentrations
after oral dosage have passed the absorption peak and
fallen to a plateau, which then decays at a rate
corresponding to the elimination half-life of the drug.
In practice this requires sampling after an interval of
about 8 h from the last oral dose. Exercise affects
interpretation of results, by increasing the binding of
digoxin to skeletal muscle. Plasma concentrations after
a period of rest can be increased by as much as 75 per
cent compared with those during exercise. Pregnancy and
renal impairment can produce falsely elevated plasma
glycoside concentrations in some assays.
Therapeutic plasma concentrations of digoxin are in the
range of 1–2 µg/litre. Those for digitoxin are
approximately 10–15 times higher, due chiefly to greater
protein binding.
Digitalis toxicity
There is considerable variation in the plasma and tissue
concentrations at which toxicity occurs. Serious
toxicity is unusual with plasma concentrations below 2
µg/litre, and are likely to be present with
concentrations more than 3 µg/litre. Between these
figures some patients have a satisfactory therapeutic
response while others have troublesome adverse effects.
The extracardiac toxic effects include fatigue with
profound muscular weakness, severe visual disturbances,
nausea and anorexia, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhoea,
headache, restlessness, and agitation.
In the absence of heart disease or very large overdose,
the cardiac manifestations are usually relatively
benign. First-, second-, and third-degree
atrioventricular block may occur, but severe bradycardia
or long pauses are unlikely because the rate of
subsidiary junctional pacemakers tends to be accelerated
by the glycosides. In patients with heart disease the
manifestations are usually more serious. While almost
any rhythm disturbance can occur, the following may be
regarded as characteristic: frequent ventricular
extrasystoles, junctional and ventricular rhythms or
tachycardias; atrial tachycardias with varying degrees
of atrioventricular block, bradycardia due to sinoatrial
block; an unduly slow ventricular response in atrial
fibrillation, progressive regularization of ventricular
response in atrial fibrillation due to the emergence of
accelerated junctional beats, and ventricular
fibrillation. Some digitalis-induced arrhythmias are
very complex and difficult to analyse. With very high
plasma levels, asystole may occur. This may be
associated with refractory hyperkalaemia.
Treatment of digitalis toxicity
In most patients it is sufficient to withhold the drug,
and especially in the presence of hypokalaemia, to give
potassium. Potassium may be contraindicated when
atrioventricular block is present because the conduction
defect may be exacerbated. Atropine and pervenous pacing
have an occasional role in the management of
bradyarrhythmias.
A specific antidote (Digibind, Ovine) is valuable
because of the risk to life in severe toxicity. The
antibody fragments rapidly bind intravascular and
interstitial digoxin. Their small size permits rapid
diffusion into the interstitial space where binding of
free digoxin sets up a concentration gradient leading to
the egress of tissue stores of the glycoside. An initial
clinical response can usually be expected within 60 min,
and complete reversal of toxicity within about 4 h. If
renal function is normal, the bound digoxin is excreted
with a half-life of approximately 16 h. The dose is
based on body weight and plasma digoxin concentration
for patients toxic from excessive maintenance therapy or
on the amount ingested after a single dose. Allergic
reactions have occurred in less than 1 per cent of
patients. Recrudescence of toxicity is rare, but caution
is needed if renal failure is severe enough to prolong
greatly the elimination of the digoxin–antibody complex,
which may eventually release free digoxin.
Lidocaine or phenytoin may be effective for serious
arrhythmias, even if they are of supraventricular
origin. b-adrenoceptor-blocking agents are useful for
ectopic ventricular arrhythmias but may precipitate
heart failure or bradyarrhythmias in susceptible
patients. Electrical cardioversion may precipitate
ventricular fibrillation and should be considered only
for the most pressing indications. The lowest effective
energy should be used. Dialysis and haemoperfusion are
ineffective for both digoxin and digitoxin toxicity
because the large tissue stores equilibrate relatively
slowly with the much lower concentrations in plasma.
b-Blockers
Recent controlled trials (undertaken largely in
relatively young men) have shown major benefit from the
use of selective b-blockers (bisoprolol, metoprolol,
carvedilol) in stable mild and moderate heart failure
due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Overall
mortality was reduced by some 30 per cent and that due
to sudden death by 44 per cent. Initial doses should be
small (e.g. metoprolol 5 mg) and increased only slowly
over weeks or months. The position with regard to
symptomless heart failure, diastolic heart failure,
heart failure in the elderly, and severe heart failure
(grade IV) is uncertain and these drugs should be
avoided in these groups until further evidence is
available.
Vasodilators
In most cases of heart failure, balanced vasodilatation
with agents that reduce both preload and afterload leads
to the greatest haemodynamic improvement and clinical
benefit. A simple classification based on whether the
major site of action is on arteries or veins is widely
adopted (Table 2). The way in which reduction in venous
(preload) or arterial (afterload) tone or both affect
the cardiac output.
Nitroprusside
Nitroprusside is a balanced vasodilator which can only
be given intravenously and whose rapid onset and offset
of action renders it only suitable, but eminently so,
for the acute situation; close haemodynamic monitoring
both of systemic arterial and right heart pressures are
essential during its use. As light degrades the parent
compound, the delivery system must be shielded. The dose
ranges from 10 µg/kg per min up to 30 µg/kg per min
depending on response. A typical indication for its use
would be a patient with low cardiac output and high
filling pressures due to poor systolic left ventricular
function resulting from dilated cardiomyopathy, acute
myocardial infarction, chronic coronary heart disease,
acute or chronic aortic or mitral incompetence, or acute
ventricular septal defect following acute myocardial
infarction. Two main problems complicate its use.
Hypotension is best avoided by starting at a very low
dose and by close continuous monitoring of systemic
arterial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures.
Second, toxic metabolites of cyanide or cyanate
accumulate in patients with liver or renal dysfunction.
These problems make many prefer nitrates which are
safer, and as effective.
Nitrates
Glyceryl trinitrate is prepared in intravenous,
sublingual, and transcutaneous formulations, while the
mainstays of oral therapy are isosorbide mono- or
dinitrate. They all cause vascular smooth muscle
relaxation, particularly in veins, by increasing
intracellular cyclic guanine monophosphate. Though some
decrease in arteriolar tone also occurs, this effect is
seen predominantly in the capacitance and pulmonary
vessels resulting, acutely, in a reduction in preload.
Frequently repeated doses of nitrate lead to the
development of tolerance.
Hydralazine
This drug is an arteriolar smooth muscle relaxant. Its
acute haemodynamic profile, but these effects do not
translate into long-term benefit in controlled trials.
The contribution of hydralazine with isosorbide
dinitrate is more effective and is now the only way in
which hydralazine is used in heart failure. The value of
the combination was shown in the two Veterans Heart
Failure trials (V-HeFTI and II). But ACE inhibitors are
superior in controlling symptoms, in exercise capacity
and in reducing mortality. Moreover, some one-third of
patients cannot tolerate the combination because of
headache, palpitation, or nasal congestion. Overall,
hydralazine plus isosorbide is a second line approach,
although a trial has shown benefit from adding this
combination to ACE inhibition. Doses of hydralazine
begin at 37.5 mg four times a day, and of isosorbide 20
mg four times daily, increasing to a maximum tolerated
dose averaging 400 and 150 mg/day respectively.
Calcium channel blockers
These agents are arteriolar vasodilators acting by
decreasing the slow inward calcium current that promotes
arterial smooth muscle contraction. The main concern in
their use in heart failure is that they also decrease
calcium availability within cardiac myocytes, which
decreases contractility. Interest in heart failure is
therefore centred on those agents with relatively
greater effects on the peripheral vascular calcium
channels, such as nifedipine, felodipine, and amlodipine.
There are few long-term studies on their value in heart
failure but several reports have shown that nifedipine
may lead to deterioration, probably reflecting its
negative inotropic effects and, in some cases, the ill
effects of secondary reflex neuroendocrine activation.
Angiotensin-converting enzymes inhibitors
ACE inhibitors are superior to other vasodilators. Their
effects depend mainly on the inhibition of conversion of
angiotensin I to II, both systemically and locally,
although their action in inhibiting destruction of
bradykinin may also be important.
The major benefits of their use probably derives from
arterial and venous dilatation, reducing cardiac filling
pressures, wall stress, chamber size, and myocardial
hypertrophy and increasing left ventricular ejection
fraction. Adverse effects are few. In advanced renal
failure, any tendency towards hyperkalaemia may be
aggravated and in very severe heart failure with low
renal perfusion pressure, inhibition of angiotensin-mediated
efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction may so reduce
glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure as to cause
acute but reversible renal failure.
Clinical efficacy
Heart failure is a progressive disorder and
deterioration depends, at least in part, on a vicious
cycle of increasing neurohumoral activation leading to
increased vascular resistance and escalating cardiac
work and dysfunction. ACE inhibitors and b-blockers are
well placed to disturb this cycle and a number of
studies have confirmed that the former reduce the rate
of progression of heart failure and delay the onset of
symptoms in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular
dysfunction. They also reduce mortality in all grades of
heart failure, including that after myocardial
infarction.
Place in management
The effects of ACE inhibitors on survival, disease
progression and the development of myocardial infarction
make them mandatory treatment in all grades of
symptomatic heart failure, although certain precautions
should be taken before treatment is started. In most
studies they have been combined with diuretics and, when
used alone have proved inadequate. In mild to moderate
left ventricular function they are now also combined
with b-blockers.
Treatment can be begun in most patients with mild or
moderate heart failure without admission to hospital,
but in those with severe heart failure on high doses of
diuretics admission is essential.
A low dose should be given initially (e.g. 2–6.25 mg
captopril, 2.5 mg enalapril). The patient should remain
seated or supine until the peak haemodynamic effect of
the drug has been observed (1–2 h with captopril, 2–6 h
with other ACE inhibitors). Head-down tilt of the bed
and intravenous saline will usually correct symptomatic
hypotension. Once treatment has been successfully
introduced, the dose can be increased to achieve maximum
symptomatic benefit, though this may be delayed for
weeks or months.
Adverse effects
First dose hypotension
A precipitous fall in blood pressure, occasionally
accompanied by a bradycardia can occur in response to
the first dose of an ACE inhibitor. This is usually only
seen in volume depleted patients, and those on large
doses of diuretic. In patients at risk a small test dose
of a short-acting inhibitor is advisable, e.g. captopril
2 mg or perhaps 6.25 mg, with close observation of the
blood pressure response over the subsequent 1–2 h.
Correction of fluid-volume status may permit subsequent
uncomplicated reintroduction of ACE inhibitors in
patients who have shown this phenomenon. It is also
important to ensure that significant pulmonary or
obstructive valve disease has not been missed and that
the patient does not have an unusual type of heart
muscle disease causing diastolic dysfunction, for
example, amyloid.
Renal dysfunction
Small increases in plasma creatinine (i.e. Ł 10 per cent
increase) are common when ACE inhibitions are used to
treat advanced heart failure, but serious renal
dysfunction is rare. Even so, frequent monitoring of
blood urea, serum creatinine and urine output are
essential when ACE inhibitors are introduced in patients
with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
Hyperkalaemia
Modest hyperkalaemia (plasma potassium 4.6–5.8 mmol/l)
is to be expected when ACE inhibitors are given to
patients whose GFR is less than 20–30 ml/min. Volume
depletion and extrarenal uraemia increase the likelihood
of hyperkalaemia and co-prescription of a non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory or potassium-conserving diuretic much
increases the risk.
Cough
There is a small but significant increase in its
incidence during ACE inhibitor therapy but, in trials,
this has not led to more withdrawals in the actively
treated patients. Cough should not be attributed
immediately to ACE inhibition, and pulmonary congestion
or airways obstruction must be excluded; even if it is
due to the ACE inhibitor, the patient may be able to
tolerate it and in some it may, on occasion, resolve
spontaneously.
Other adverse effects
Taste disturbance, skin rash, proteinuria, and
leucopenia have been rare in recent trials. Angio-oedema
is another rare but troublesome complication.
Catecholamines
Haemodynamic profiles and usage of catecholamines
In contrast to the use of b-blockers in stable mild to
moderate heart failure catecholamines can be used
intravenously to provide short-term circulatory support
in acute severe failure. They enhance the inotropic
state of the heart, although both salbutamol and
low-dose dopamine have the useful actions of peripheral,
splanchnic, or renal vasodilatation and noradrenaline
may cause vasoconstriction.
Any increase in the inotropic state of the heart, also
increases myocardial oxygen consumption to a greater or
lesser extent. An increase in heart rate will further
augment oxygen demand as will the development of
tachyarrhythmias. Catecholamine usage in an individual
patient requires careful consideration of the balance
between augmented short-term cardiac performance and
longer-term adverse effects on myocardial oxygen
demands.
Adrenergic pharmacology
Classification of adrenergic receptors into a and b
subtypes has been considerably refined (Table 4) and now
includes a-1, a-2, b-1, b-2, and dopamine receptor
subtypes. In chronic heart failure, cardiac efferent
sympathetic activity is increased coupled with
impairment of neuronal reuptake further increasing
intrasynaptic noradrenaline concentration. However,
tolerance to the action of both endogenous and exogenous
catecholamines arises through b-adrenoceptor
downregulation.
Noradrenaline, adrenaline, and dopamine and their
synthetic derivatives interact with the six adrenoceptor
subtypes according to their specificity and affinity for
these receptors. Human ventricular muscle contains
predominantly b-1-adrenoceptor subtypes in close
proximity to the adrenergic synapse, mediating an
inotropic response. The sinoatrial node, however, may
respond preferentially to b-2-adrenoceptors distributed
throughout the specialized tissue and responsive to
circulating catecholamines (adrenaline/noradrenaline) as
well as neuronally released noradrenaline.
Dopamine
Effects are dose-dependent; the renal and mesenteric
circulation, and to a lesser extent the coronary and
cerebrovascular vessels dilate at low-dose (Table 6).
The most important clinical effect is on the kidney with
increased renal blood flow, glomerular filtration, and
natriuresis. This action is especially useful in the
management of persistent heart failure associated with
reversible reduction in myocardial contractility or with
impaired diuretic responsiveness as a result of renal
artery vasoconstriction. Dopaminergic vasodilatation is
antagonized by phenothiazines and by butyrophenones.
Higher doses activate b-1-adrenoceptors leading to an
increase in myocardial contractility and heart rate and
an increase in myocardial oxygen demand. Yet they may
augment coronary perfusion pressure. High-dose dopamine
infusion leads to dominant a-1-adrenoceptor actions and
peripheral vasoconstriction.
Noradrenaline
The main actions of noradrenaline are
a-receptor-mediated vasoconstriction and
b-1-adrenoceptor-mediated enhancement of contractility.
Arteriolar vasoconstriction significantly increases
blood pressure and cardiac output usually decreases.
Heart rate usually falls because of baroreceptor
mediated vagal stimulation and sympathetic withdrawal
(as a result of elevated blood pressure) of
b-1-adrenoceptor stimulation. Vasoconstriction is most
intense in muscle, skin, liver, and kidney. Actions on
the myocardium result from increased afterload,
increased preload, and increased contractility.
Myocardial oxygen demand will increase. Noradrenaline is
useful in the short term to improve cerebral and
coronary perfusions in shock, during resuscitation and
may be used to counteract hypotension as a result of
vasodilator therapy. It has little role in the longer
term when adverse effects on oxygen demand are likely to
be hazardous.
Adrenaline
Action on a- and b-adrenoceptors (most notably the
b-1-adrenoceptors) in the heart augments cardiac
contractility and increases heart rate, automaticity,
and conduction. Vasoconstriction and increase in blood
pressure are less pronounced than with noradrenaline. At
low dose, systemic vascular resistance may fall while at
higher doses vasoconstriction is evident. Myocardial
oxygen demand is substantially and progressively
increased and tachycardia and cardiac arrhythmias may
limit usefulness particularly with acute circulatory
failure. The main use is in short-term acute inotropic
support, for example during cardiopulmonary
resuscitation.
Isoprenaline
Isoprenaline has powerful b-adrenoceptor stimulatory
actions, producing increases in heart rate, inotropic
state and atrioventricular conduction and automaticity.
Peripheral vascular and pulmonary vascular resistance
fall from b-2-adrenoceptor stimulation. Systolic blood
pressure may rise from cardiac effects, although
diastolic pressure normally falls. Myocardial oxygen
consumption increases greatly and arrhythmias and
myocardial ischaemia frequently limit dose.
Isoprenaline is most frequently used for its
chronotropic action as a short-term intravenous infusion
in patients with symptomatic bradycardia, for example
heart block. The infusion rate may be adjusted to
achieve a heart rate alleviating acute symptoms, pending
longer-term management such as cardiac pacing. Rarely,
oral medication (30–60 mg 6-hourly) is necessary if
other chronotropic measures are not available.
Dobutamine
This drug has some b-1-adrenoceptor selectivity and
hence has less effect on the sinus node and on heart
rate. Enhancement of left ventricular contractile
activity provides a useful short-term role for it in
shock states with primary or secondary ventricular
disease. Effects on heart rate and arrhythmogenesis,
however, are not infrequently limiting.
Salbutamol
This b-2-adrenoceptor agonist causes peripheral
vasodilatation and hence afterload reduction. Increases
in heart rate limit clinical usefulness and alternative
vasodilator agents are usually to be preferred.
Dopexamine
Dopexamine is a dopamine analogue acting on
b-2-adrenoceptors and some dopamine receptors. The
combined effects of renal, hepatic, and splanchnic
vasodilatation with peripheral vasodilatation offer a
haemodynamic profile that may be of value, although
increases in heart rate, as with dobutamine, can
restrict its use.
Phosphodiesterase inhibitors
Emoximone and milrinone are selective phosphodiesterase
inhibitors with primary myocardial effects. These drugs
increase cardiac contractility, promote ventricular
relaxation and cause modest peripheral vasodilatation.
Improvements in myocardial performance are short lived,
and both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias may be
increased.
|
Prognosis
In severe heart failure where patients are symptomatic
at rest (NYHA class IV) the prognosis is very poor, with
a survival rate of 1 year or less. Even in mild heart
failure (class II–III), the mortality rate is 8–10 per
cent per year.
Many parameters have prognostic value in patients with
heart failure. The most important are: (1) the extent of
left ventricular dysfunction; (2) the degree of
functional limitation; (3) the electrolyte disturbance;
(4) the degree of neurohumoral dysfunction; and (5)
electrophysiological or electrocardiographic indicators
of ventricular arrhythmogenesis.
Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter
monitoring is a sign of an increased probability of
mortality from sudden death. Class I antiarrhythmic
agents can reduce the frequency of ventricular
tachycardia, but the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression
Trial, of three such agents, showed that, despite
reducing the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias, there
was an increased rate of sudden death, presumably due to
some proarrhythmic effects. Similarly a low ejection
fraction is an adverse prognostic sign, and it was
expected that agents which improve ejection fraction
should increase survival. Positive inotropic oral
agents, such as milrinone, in controlled studies
increase ejection fraction but with a reduced survival.
Thus the only justifications for treatment are to slow
the progression of the underlying disease, to relieve
symptoms, or to use agents proven to improve survival.
|
|
|
|