Clinica Cayanga Medical Resources

Clinical Updates


Clinical Updates
Alzheimer's Disease
Arthritis
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Depression
Diabetes Mellitus
Dyspepsia
Erectile Dysfunction
Fatty Liver
Gallstone
Hepatitis
Hypertension
Lung Cancer
Mesothelioma
Metabolic Syndrome
Obesity
Prostate Cancer
Stroke
Tinnitus
 
Medical Library
Breaking Medical News
Clinical Tools
Dermatology
Diabetes Corner
Evidence-Based Medicine
Free Medical Books
Free Medical Journal
History Taking and Physical Examination
Medical Journal (popular)
Medical Organizations
Palm Tools
Medical Physiology (Lecture)
Medical Resources
Medical Search
Online Clinical Calculator
 
 

 

Adverse events greater with rosuvastatin (CRESTOR) than other statins

 


Clinical question
Are statins similar regarding adverse drug reactions?

Bottom line
The United States Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Health Canada, and European regulators have recently issued advisories to physicians regarding higher doses of rosuvastatin. These data -- though inherently limited by their voluntary nature and the possibility of reporting bias -- lend credence to concerns that rosuvastatin is less safe than other statins. It is also the only statin for which we do not have patient-oriented outcome data.

Reference
Alsheikh-Ali AA, Ambrose MS, Kuvin JT, Karas RH. The safety of rosuvastatin as used in common clinical practice: a postmarketing analysis. Circulation 2005;111:3051-57.

Study design: Other

Setting: Population-based

Synopsis
The authors searched 2 FDA databases for adverse event reports by health professionals and patients for several statins. The number of reports per million patients were calculated for a 1-year period during which the following 4 statins were simultaneously available: rosuvastatin (Crestor), simvastatin (Zocor), pravastatin (Pravachol), and atorvastatin (Lipitor). That rate was also calculated for the first year that each statin was available; for this calculation, data for cerivastatin (Baychol), a statin removed from the market for safety reasons, were also included. Results were reported for a variety of individual adverse events (rhabdomyolysis, proteinuria, nephropathy, and renal failure) and for a composite of more serious adverse events (fatal, life-threatening, or requiring hospitalization). Composite adverse event reports were approximately 2 to 8 times more common with rosuvastatin than with the other 3 currently available statins during the composite observation period, as well as during the first postmarketing year (the corresponding rate for cerivastatin was 3 times higher yet than that for rosuvastatin). The same was true of serious adverse event reports and each of the individual reports during the composite observation period, although more serious adverse events were seen during the first postmarketing year for simvastatin than rosuvastatin. This may be because simvastatin was given with a fibrate much more often than rosuvastatin (18.4% vs 7.6%; P < .01). Particularly worrisome is the fact that 62% of the adverse events with rosuvastatin occurred at a dose of 10 mg or lower.

   

Home | Introduction | Scheduling a Visit| Laboratory Work Reaching Us | Map to our Office | About the Doctors

 

 

 ©2005 Clinica Cayanga. All rights reserved.