CLINICA CAYANGA |
||
|
|
Acupuncture possibly effective for ulcerative colitis |
|
|
Alzheimer's
Disease Arthritis Asthma Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Coronary Artery Disease Depression Diabetes Mellitus Dyspepsia Erectile Dysfunction Fatty Liver Gallstone Hepatitis Hypertension Lung Cancer Mesothelioma Metabolic Syndrome Obesity Pneumonia Pregnancy Prostate Cancer Sinusitis Stroke Tinnitus |
Clinical Question: Are acupuncture and moxibustion effective for the treatment of ulcerative colitis? Bottom Line: Differences in efficacy between traditional acupuncture and sham acupuncture were small and significant only for Colitis Activity Index (CAI) as the main outcome measure. Both traditional and sham acupuncture seem to offer an additional therapeutic benefit in patients with mild to moderately active Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Reference: Joos S, Wildau N, Kohnen R, et al. Acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2006;41:1056-1063. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial (single-blinded) Synopsis: Acupuncture has traditionally been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in China and is increasingly applied in Western countries. The authors investigate the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). They did a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial 29 patients with mild to moderately active UC (mean age 37.8 +/- 12.0 years) were randomly assigned to receive either traditional acupuncture and moxa (TCM group, n = 15), or sham acupuncture consisting of superficial needling at non-acupuncture points (control group, CG, n = 14). All patients were treated in 10 sessions over a period of 5 weeks and followed-up for 16 weeks. The main outcome measure was the change in the Colitis Activity Index (CAI) after treatment; secondary outcome measures were changes in quality of life, general well-being and serum markers of inflammation. In the TCM group, the CAI decreased from 8.0 (+/- 3.7) to 4.2 (+/- 2.4) points and in the control group from 6.5 (+/- 3.4) to 4.8 (+/- 3.9) points (TCM versus CG: p = 0.048). In both groups these changes were associated with significant improvements in general well-being (TCM group: from 3.0 (+/- 1.8) to 1.8 (+/- 1.0); CG: from 3.2 (+/- 1.9) to 2.2 (+/- 1.7)) and quality of life (TCM group: from 146 (+/- 23) to 182 (+/- 18); CG: from 157 (+/- 20) to 183 (+/- 23)). No significant differences between the TCM and CG were found regarding these secondary outcome measures. |
|
|
Patient Information |
||
| Health For Life | ||
|
Medical Library |
||
|
Breaking Medical News Clinical Tools Coronary Risk Profile Dermatology Diabetes Corner Evidence-Based Medicine Free Medical Books Free Medical Journal History Taking and Physical Examination Hows on Making Diagnostic Examination Medical Journal (popular) Medical Organizations Medical Professional News Neurological and Psychiatric Problems in Clinical Practice Palm Tools Medical Notes Medical Physiology (Lecture) Medical Resources Medical Search Online Clinical Calculator Scientific Meeting |
||
| Online Sari-Sari Store | ||
Please
support Clinica Cayanga Medical Resources by purchasing gift items
at  |
||
|
Home | Introduction | Scheduling a Visit| Laboratory Work | Reaching Us | Map to our Office | About the Doctors |
||